Tag: Houdini

Houdini’s Limit on Google

Inside Magic Image of Harry HoudiniWe love the world’s best known magician, Houdini. We also take great pride in our programming abilities and yet we were stumped yesterday trying to load an active graph from Google documenting the past and present searches for Houdini since 2010. We couldn’t go back further; like to 1920 and figured out that we were limited by the reality that Google did not exist in the Roaring Twenties.

So while we don’t have the live data stream for Houdini searches on InsideMagic.com yet, we can report that the term Houdini continues to be searched daily with peaks in the number of searches on special days and weeks around Halloween and the date of his death in 1926.

Why were we trying to construct this real-time search presentation?

First because we thought it was a cool tool to put on our website. We’re always looking to spice up our space.

Second, because we search for news or articles about Houdini daily. Sometimes the searches come back related to a rapper that used Houdini in his name. Sometimes it comes back with a wine bottle opener. Sometimes it comes back with the great Houdini Magic Shop from Disneyland or Las Vegas. But usually there is at least one hit for Houdini, the world-famous magician and escape artist par excellence.

It is amazing that his name, story and images still register on the Google Search metrics.

What a testament to his self-promotion, his place in modern history and his ability to entrance modern audiences even without being present (assuming you disregard claims of connections during seances).

Magicians today still make reference to Houdini in their acts; often comparing themselves to the master performer. The modern audiences have never seen Houdini (other than the Tony Curtis film, perhaps) but the reference still resonates with them.

We tried to think of other performers that have that kind of staying power. In the 1920s the American and European theaters were jammed full of performers and on a typical evening’s bill, there would be a star or top act. Yet, we are at a loss to name any of them unless they later had a career in a more permanent medium like film or radio.

Houdini is what got us heavily into magic and we assume his popularity is having the same effect on a new generation of magicians and escape artists.

What a wonderful art we have.

By the way, if we are ever in doubt about Houdini’s work or history, we refer to the source that knows all, Wild About Houdini, run by John Cox. If you are a Houdini fan, it needs to be your first stop daily for the latest findings and exploration about this incredible legend.

We will continue to work with our crack programming team to get real time search stats on InsideMagic.com but until then, we’ll just report the highlights we find through our searching or from Mr. Cox’ website.

What Goes Into Inventing a New Magic Trick?

Slide Rule Fun from International Slide Rule History Museum
Fun Pre-Computer

What goes into inventing a magic trick?

That’s a question we are trying to answer as we develop, possibly for sale, an effect that could be popular with close-up magicians.  Because that’s what we do, close-up magic, it seemed natural to make commercial offerings of the tricks we do for audiences in the amateur rooms at The Magic Castle.

So we have this trick that audiences seem to enjoy and it really just depends on sleight of hand invented by our forbears.  We don’t know who invented the classic force – perhaps Johann Hofzinser back in the 1800s or someone more recent.  We want to credit the right person and so we search.  We can tell you one thing for sure, do not look up “Classic Force” on Google from your work computer.  Wow.  There is something not right with this world.

The second part of the trick involves a false pass of an object.  Who invented that?  Maybe one of Hofzinser’s friends or students or maybe it was T. Nelson Downs (“The King of Koins”).  We want to credit this move to its rightful owner as well.

But inventing a trick means more than giving credit to the right person.  We found we needed to write instructions for magicians wishing to practice the effect and performing it to maximum effect.  We are not big on giving a link to the magician and letting him or her find the instruction video on-line.  It seems impersonal and an easy way out.  We’re more of a UF Grant kind of organization with illustrated instructions covering each move and describing how to perform said move.

Let’s assume we get past the crediting and the instruction writing, the next step will be to come up with a name that grabs users’ attention.  We never had a name for this trick.  It was always just the effect we working on.  We’ll have to work on that as well.

Finally, we have to write ad copy that doesn’t mislead potential buyers.  We want to be honest about the effect to be presented from the audience’s point of view, the skills necessary to perform the effect, any angle issues, and whether the performer will need to practice to perform.

Let’s assume we get the ad copy correct and have no blatant lies in our listing, we will have to get friends and associates to write one sentence, objective recommendations for the effect.  We know some influential people and maybe they would be kind enough to write such praise.  We’d like some of the praise to follow the current trend of “fooled me badly,” “the kind of trick you will carry always” “I was floored” “Not since biblical times has such a miracle been seen,” “I rank the inventions as Sliced Bread, [the yet to be named trick] and the cotton gin,” “if I could buy only one trick that I would use constantly it would be …” “the finest trick of its kind anywhere” or the ever popular “I wish this wasn’t being sold so I could be the only one who had it.”

Then comes the pricing.  We don’t know how to price an ordinary deck of cards (with which one can perform second deals) and the special gimmicks that make the trick possible.  We’re thinking the cards could be supplied by the performer so we would only need to send the gimmicks.  They don’t weigh too much – maybe a couple of ounces but they are specially made and cost us about $14 each.  So we’re looking at a total cost of $30 or so.  By checking mark-up of similar effects, we figure that means we should charge anywhere from $45 to $75.

Of course the second we launch the effect, we’ll learn from the various forums that the trick was actually invented by someone either a year ago or back in the 1920s.  We’ll feel terrible, apologize and take it off the market.

That’s just how we work.  We believe in not stealing effects, even if it is done without actual knowledge.  We don’t steal jokes either.  In fact, we have a non-stealing philosophy about most things – we’ll steal a kiss from our sweetie or steal fake fruit from a movie set if the script calls for it – but otherwise we’re this side of taking things we don’t own outright.

We wonder how so many magicians can invent new tricks, take the criticism of theft that comes from the magic public; or worse, failure to properly credit the innovators who invented parts of the trick.  They must have iron constitutions.  It would send us into a shame spiral – and not a good kind where you’re ashamed that you won a beauty contest over someone who came in second only because she couldn’t remember a good answer to one of those questions asked by celebrity judges.  A bad kind of shame spiral where you doubt everything you have ever done and assume no one like you.

We thought about copyrighting, patenting or trademarking the trick to prevent theft – assuming we are the inventor of the trick but our research shows that none of these intellectual property laws would help.  Copyright goes to the expression of an idea on paper or in action.  We could copyright our instructions but someone could come along with a new set of instructions and avoid a copyright claim.  A trademark only protects indications of origin of the effect.  As long as the thief differentiated the source with a new trademark or name for the trick – which right now would be easy because it doesn’t have a name – he or she would be scott-free.  A patent would not help because we would have to expose the secret to the patent office and to the world.  There would be nothing to sell, the secret would be out.  There are plenty of examples of patented magic tricks.  We would normally link such things but do not want to give away secrets — even very old ones.

Maybe we’ll keep the trick in our act, teach magicians we know if they ask, and watch as they improve upon it in their performances.  No shame spiral is likely and pride is almost certain to come.

If you see us and want to know the trick (assuming you are a bona fide magician) we’ll share it with you if it isn’t already obvious from our performance.  Sharing is caring and we care deeply about our wonderful art and the friends we have met.  The same friends we would have imposed upon to write glowing reviews such as “I literally lost control of my bodily functions upon seeing the effect,” or “this is the kind of trick with which you can start a cult.”

Houdini: A Case Study in Trauma

Today's Trauma Care Could Have Saved HoudiniThe May 21, 2009 on-line edition of the journal Advance for LPNs features Cynthia Blank Reid captivating review of the ultimately unsuccessful trauma treatment administered Harry Houdini.

Ms. Reid approaches the Houdini case not as a magic historian or Houdini enthusiast.  Her expertise is in medical miracles.  She works as a trauma clinical nurse specialist in Philadelphia and her perspective is illuminating.

She  gives a clinical evaluation of Houdini’s physical condition prior to his appendicitis.

“Houdini was a relatively small man, standing 5’5″,” she writes.  “He kept himself in shape by swimming, running and doing acrobatics. His medical history was unremarkable until early October 1926, when a series of events would culminate in his death.”

Houdini’s ability and willingness to perform through pain was evidenced when he broke a bone earlier in that fateful year.

“Then, one night in 1926, while performing his famous Water Torture Cell escape, during which Houdini hung suspended upside-down in a chamber of water, ropes secured to his feet were jerked improperly, causing his ankle to break. Houdini refused medical care, insisting the show go on.”

She recounts the slugging received from a McGill University student and his complaints of stomach pain later that evening.

“The next day, Houdini, Bess and his assistants caught a late train and traveled 1,000 miles to begin shows in Detroit. While on the train, he experienced stomach pains so severe Bess telegraphed ahead to request a doctor meet them at the Statler Hotel.
Unfortunately, the train was late and there was no time to go to the hotel, so everyone went directly to the old Garrick Theater to set up for the next show.

“At the theater, Houdini, suffering from a 104º F fever, was diagnosed with acute appendicitis by Daniel Cohn, MD. He recommended emergency surgery.

“Houdini refused and went on with the show, which started 30 minutes late. He collapsed after the first act, but was able to revive himself and continue with the rest of the show.

“After the final act, he collapsed again and was taken to the hotel. This time, Dr. Cohn brought with him Charles S. Kennedy, MD, chief of surgery at Detroit’s Grace Hospital. He agreed Houdini needed an operation. Houdini then called his personal physician, William Stone, who was at home in New York.
Only after the physicians consulted on the phone did Houdini agree to go to Grace Hospital.”

Ms. Reid concludes that while Houdini died from peritonitis stemming from his ruptured appendix, there remain questions about the case.
Seven days before he passed away, surgeons performed an appendectomy.

The doctors “discovered his appendix was ruptured and gangrenous. He also was suffering from a fulminating streptococcal peritonitis. There were no antibiotics. Doctors told Bess his illness was fatal.

While Houdini would rally slightly after a second operation five days later designed to remove some of the infection, it was short-lived.

Ms. Reid suggests Houdini’s case is worth study for even modern professionals.  She points out there are no reported cases of “an appendix being ruptured by blunt trauma. Could Houdini’s be the first?”

If the slugging did not cause the rupture, could it still have had some role in the spread of the infection?

“Is it possible an abscess had formed around his appendix? The abscess would have walled off the infection, but when he was struck in the abdomen, did it rupture?”  she suggests.

“There are documented cases of appendix abscesses, and some of them have ruptured. Was Houdini already suffering from appendicitis when he received the blows to his abdomen? If so, did it cause him to delay seeking medical treatment for any discomfort until it was too late?”

Ms. Reid believes that if Houdini presented the same symptoms in a modern trauma center today, the doctors would still operate on the magician.  The surgery plus today’s antibiotics would have most certainly saved his life.

Check out the on-line version of LPN Advance here.

Houdini Victim of Attack, Dead in Nine Days

Flop SweatThis was the day, 98 years ago, that a Canadian art student struck Houdini as he reclined backstage and began the peritonitis to take charge.  The impact of the punch was sudden but the death it caused lasted another nine days.  On Halloween at 1:26 pm, the great magician gave into his final challenge and passed.

J. Gorden Whitehead administered the fatal blow on an unsuspecting performer.  He hadn’t yet readied his body to demonstrate his ability to survive such a blow.  Whitehead challenged the performer sayin he had heard Houdini’s stomach muscles were strong enough to resist such a blow.  Before he could brace his frame for the impact, Whitehead delivered the fatal strike.

The website, Vantage News, has good coverage and the rumors that flowed about the attack being revenge for Houdini’s outspoken attacks on fraudulent mediums and so-called psychics.

From the Vantage News website this evening:

Whitehead, a student from McGill University, had heard that Houdini could withstand hard punches to the abdomen, a stunt the magician often demonstrated during his performances. During the visit, Whitehead asked if this was true, and without warning, he struck Houdini multiple times in the stomach. Houdini, who was reclining on a couch at the time and not prepared for the attack, didn’t have time to tighten his muscles to absorb the blows.

Despite being in pain, Houdini continued with his scheduled performances over the next few days. However, his condition worsened, and after collapsing during a show in Detroit, he was rushed to the hospital. Doctors discovered that Houdini was suffering from acute appendicitis, and his appendix had ruptured, causing a serious infection known as peritonitis. Houdini underwent surgery on October 24, but his health continued to decline, and he passed away on October 31, 1926, at the age of 52.

Please be sure to check out Vantage News for more information and images of Houdini’s funeral.

A dark day in the life of Houdini fanatics.

But speaking of Houdini Fanatics (Capital “F” for Famous Fanatics), be sure to check out John Cox’ website for all things Houdini at “Wild About Harry” here.  If John didn’t say it, I don’t believe it.  He is the ultimate arbiter of Houdini lore and facts.

Houdini’s Draft Card on Display

The National Archives has great stuff generally but specifically when it comes to magic history.

We found the front and back of Houdini (or as he called himself, Harry Handcuff Houdini) from September 12, 1918.  The cards identify Bess (Beatrice) as his his nearest relative and specifies he is “medium” build and height with blue eyes and black hair.  Interestingly, Houdini also stated he was “Native Born” and had a “weak left hand.”

Front of Houdini Draft Card
Houdini Draft Card

Back of Houdini Draft Card
Back of Draft Card

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Find more about our great magical history at the National Archives online here.

InsideMagic Questions for the Editor

Sea Monkey Ad
Sea Monkey Ad

From time to time, InsideMagic.com takes questions from real and made-up readers.  As our readership dips, there are more of the latter than the former.  However, the following are real questions either made-up or stolen from other sites but answered here.

Q: What is the best card force?

A: There are several card forces we previously used but after attending a seminar on a beach in the Los Angeles area, we abandoned the whole concept of forcing someone to do anything against their will.  As the seminar leader, GJERi (pronounced “Gej Erry”) said over our single meal for the full four-day session, “we, us, should respect the force in all of us, always.” He didn’t say that applied to forcing a card on a volunteer from an audience, but we weren’t sure exactly because the one meal we got was made up of naturally sourced Oreo cookies and sea water.

Consequently, we do not use forces in our card magic now.  We use an equivoque, “Do you want to see a card trick or a non-card trick?”  If they say a card trick, we say, “oh, do you want to see a card trick where magic seems to happen or where you just take a card and we all see the card and make comments about your free choice?” If they insist on a magic card trick, we continue the equivoque and say, “Hey, how about a card trick that doesn’t use cards?” Eventually, by our use of the equivoque, we can convince them to see a rope trick like The Professor’s Nightmare.

We asked GJERi about the use of equivoque since that seems to be forcing in some manner but he didn’t answer our email.  We were going to send him another email but realized that would be trying to force him to do something – like not ghosting us even though we spent $1,125 dollars to sit on a beach, get sunburned and experience an incredibly dangerous sugar high by binging on Oreo cookies and drinking saltwater for our only meal.

When or if he replies, we will update our answer.

 

Q: Why did InsideMagic.Com stop selling Sea Monkeys?

A:  You likely were reading some of our really old versions of InsideMagic.  As loyal readers know, Inside Magic began long-ago, before the internet but after the commercial moveable type printing machine.  The older, printed versions of this essential magic news source had advertisements on the back two pages and a full back cover with ads.

We offered:

  • X-Ray Glasses
  • Whoopie Cushions (four sizes)
  • Squirting Flowers
  • Ant Farms, Ant Industrial Buildings, and Ant Unemployment Offices
  • Submarines powered by baking soda and vinegar
  • Glass balls to put in your nostril and appear to have a snot bubble
  • Defanged Rattlesnakes
  • Fanged Rattlesnakes (appropriately marked with warnings because of the lawsuit)
  • Questionable Jello Molds

And, of course, Sea Monkeys.

In 1978 there was a worldwide shortage of Sea Monkeys due to the illegal collusion of Sea Monkey producers keeping the monkeys off the market for higher prices.

The only Sea Monkeys you could source were either pieces of carrot shaped like a Sea Monkey or dead Sea Monkeys.  Neither were selling even with our sales pitch that “You could eat both in tough times.”

In 1982, the Global Sea Monkey Monopoly was broken up by the United Nations and a strong decision from the world court at the Hague.  Unfortunately, the ruling meant that the market was now flooded with Sea Monkeys.  Some were aged and infirm.  These GrandPa Sea Monkeys wouldn’t move quickly in buyers’ aquariums but would just sit on rocks and watch the fish.  Worse than the GrandPa Sea Monkeys were the unruly Teen Sea Monkeys who played pranks on the GrandPa Sea Monkeys – some went so far as to use our smallest sized Whoopie Cushion.  The Whoopie Cushion startled the oldsters something terrible.

Then came the internet and we decided to move away from selling Sea Monkeys into investing in a Sea Monkey Dating App – Monkey Sea / Monkey Do.  This was popular for a year or two until most of the users turned out to be GrandPa Sea Monkeys looking for Teen Sea Monkeys and it was shut down by several governmental agencies.

Q: Can magicians really read mimes?

A:  Yes, magicians have developed skills in observation and reading of body language.  No mime stands a chance with a good magician.  Whether they are miming being trapped in a glass booth or walking against the wind, a magician can tell exactly what they are trying to convey.  We assume that is the question you were asking unless “mimes” was a typo.

Continue reading “InsideMagic Questions for the Editor”

Happy National Magic Day

Amazing Kellar PosterWe read that today, January 31st, is International Magic Day and it couldn’t have come at a better time.

Magic has done so much to make our life so exciting, interesting and satisfying.  There is a special feeling in bringing a special feeling to an audience member.  When the volunteer shows surprise or shock at what they have witnessed from a close-up perspective and validates the magic effect for the rest of the audience.  They trust the volunteer, the volunteer is amazed by the magician and thus the audience shares the amazement.

We have so many effects in bins, closets, suitcases and bookshelves.

Some will never see the light of day, some will be practiced and yet never included in our act but will be held in our suit pockets waiting to be pulled out and shown.  Our prop for our close-up routine as performed in the amateurs’ room at the Magic Castle consists of a single Bee deck with the Billy McComb crimp but our pockets are filled with so much more.

Magic taught us to come out of our shy personality, to have confidence in presentation, experience the joy in making an audience laugh and gasp, and provide us with a history to pass along to younger magicians just as we had been taught by our mentors.

We are asked after virtually every performance, “how did you learn?”  The question warms our heart because we remember all those professionals and amateurs who took the time to teach, watch, help to evaluate our performance and provide meaningful feedback.  We think of their kind eyes watching our performances at IBM and SAM club meetings and their kind words, later at a diner, about how we can improve and what we did well.

So, International Magic Day is a day to remember our mentors, family (always patient and willing to take a card, any card), and the enormous giants of our craft both historical and present.

What a wonderful life magic has provided.

WILD ABOUT HARRY: Houdini planning a new film in 1925?

We were searching John Cox’ wonderful website Wild About Harry and found a very interesting article about Houdini’s possible return to film making in 1925 – a year before his untimely passing.

Mr. Cox points out that the nascent film was to be based on Miracle Mongers and their Methods.   We consider that book to be a must read for every fan of Houdini and the history of Spiritualism.  Fortunately it is no available in the public domain and thus accessible to fans gratis.

We would have paid big money to see the film.

Thank you to Mr. Cox for finding this important piece of history and sharing it with us Houdini fans.

Please check out his full article at Wild About Harry here.

As we know, Houdini stepped away from movie making after he completed The Man From Beyond and Haldane of the Secret Service in 1921. So the idea he’d consider a return in 1925 is pretty interesting. It’s also interesting to see the name of Arthur B. Reeve, who co-wrote The Master Mystery and Houdini’s Hollywood films.In 1923 Houdini told the L.A. Times he planned to adapt his book Miracle Mongers and Their Methods into an “out-and-out stunt picture” following his Keith’s vaudeville tour. This item appeared the Monday after he completed that tour. So could this signal the start of that process?

Source: WILD ABOUT HARRY: Houdini planning a new film in 1925?

Inside Magic Review: The Imp Bottle

Advertisement for Imp BottleEditor’s note: With the pandemic causing dramatic changes in our Art, we thought we would republish some of our reviews from a while back.  Here is one from September 19th, 1907.  Inside Magic was just a pamphlet then and published in limited quantities (and qualities). 

The hottest trick on the market is the new Imp Bottle effect.  It is the rave of all the magicians in the know that we know.  It has received oodles of praise in the magic press and greats such as Houdini, Kellar and Thurston have testified to its endearing qualities and profound affect on audiences.  Just how good is it?  Inside Magic’s review follows but the skinny is that it is the genuine article, the cat’s meow and how.

Effect: You show a cute little vase made from a high quality wood and finished with a brilliant sheen.  It stands erect on the table or in the magi’s hand.  You explain that this bottle contains an “imp” that can be mischievous at times if not assuaged with praise.  If the imp is pleased, he will allow the vase to lie down with its top touching the table.  If, however, the imp feels frightened or insulted, he will refuse to allow the bottle to be set in such a configuration.

You demonstrate what you have explained by praising the imp and comforting it with soothing talk.  You then set the vase on its side and it remains in that position until you take it back up.

You now ask one of your many spectators to hold the vase and try to set it on its side.  Despite the volunteer’s kind words and good intentions, the imp in the bottle refuses to recline.  The vase remains standing straight up.  It is quite a mystery.

Review: We received the effect from a magic supply house for the purposes of this review but that shouldn’t bias our assessment.  We have to give it back when we are done with it.

This one is a real fooler.  The effect as described above is exactly what your audience sees.  You can play up the story of the “imp” with gusto and ad libs aplenty because the effect is almost a self-working one.  When we performed this for an audience recently, we gave a story about how the imp was entrapped in the bottle by a mean sorcerer who was jealous of the imp and his charming ways.  Perhaps the story went on too long because the audience dwindled to a single member and we presume he remained only because we set the imp bottle in his hand as we provided our patter.  Nonetheless, he was suitably impressed when he found that despite his kind words and magic flourishes provided by his free hand, he could not make the imp comply with his instructions.  No matter what he tried, the bottle would not remain on its side.

We felt badly for those in the audience that left before this pay-off because it was a real hum-dinger!

In the future, we will limit the time allotted for our story about the imp to no more than five minutes.  We started losing audience members around the ten minute mark and so five minutes ought to provide just the right amount of backstory to build up the astounding final effect.

If you are a close-up magician, this is a trick you should have in your waist coat or vest pocket no matter the situation.  It is the perfect combination of “easy to do” and “great to see.”

For those of us who do stage shows, it may be possible to build this into a very large bottle with a real imp but we haven’t worked out the plans for such an illusion.

Inside Magic Rating: Five Out of Five!

Letters to the Magic Editor

Book of Kells Inspired Magic Illustration.jpgWhen in the course of human events (magic related), it becomes necessary by regulation or law to respond to readers and or correct mistakes in content, Inside Magic will provide its Letters to the Editor service to our dear reader.

To The Editor:

Do you call it a “silk” or a “handkerchief” or something else?

Editor Responds:

Good question.

Magician’s often display a piece of cloth made of silk or some synthetic blend.  The wave it before the audience and sometimes need to identify it for some reason.  This is whence the “silk” versus “handkerchief” debate arises.  We have performed exhaustive research into the topic and some of our long-time readers will no doubt recall our six-volume set on the topic, Silks, Hanks or Cloth: A Complete History published through Magic Text, our failed (we are not afraid to admit it) hard-bound publishing division in 1998.

We didn’t see this whole internet thing taking off and never thought a book could be made available in electronic format.  We were confused at the time by the onrush of so many alternatives for information distribution so we figured we’d take the safe path and publish our books the old-fashioned way; in leather-bound, handmade tomes illustrated in the same style as the Book of Kells.  The shipping cost was very high – the set weighed some weight in British “stones” or metric or something.

The other thing that hurt sales was the threatened injunction from Tom Hanks – who is a nice guy but has aggressive lawyers – to stop the publication for fear that folks would assume erroneously that we were using his name to indicate some kind of connection to or endorsement by the then Academy Award® winning actor.  That was not our purpose – of course.

In fact the first book of the six-book set specifically pointed out how “Hanks” should not be used as a term because it could be confused with a person or even an actor.

For our other books, Magic Wand Handling: Safety and Security (a three-volume set with illustration set by a comic book writer from Tokyo) did very well but couldn’t make up for the losses we suffered with the first set.  Magic Text went out of business in 1990 and we were despondent – the two are not related.  We tend to be despondent and so this was just more of the normal but now with a reason to be despondent.

We had to lay-off twelve Irish illustrators and one Japanese comic book illustrator.

They all took it well – or so we thought – until they all filed wrongful termination claims against us.  While we were despondent to be sued, we were so impressed by the beautiful way they illustrated their claims, that our souls were lifted as we settled for a confidential amount.

Continue reading “Letters to the Magic Editor”