AI Patter for Magic Cups and Balls

Computer using AI to write patter for a magic trick
Non-AI Computer

Maybe be have been wrong about AI all along.

Here is Chat GPT’s take on the best patter for the classic Cups and Balls.

We used to demo the Fun Incorporated plastic “Cups and Balls” trick at a magic shop hundreds of times per week. It may not have been as funny but it is burned into our frontal lobe.

Our patter never changed, “Here’s three balls of the same color and three differently colored cups.  We take the first ball and place it on top of the first cup, cover it with the second cup and . . . .”  Unlike Chat GPT’s patter, we had no secret surprise of fruit at the end.  We just said the price ($1.25) and laid out the three different colored cups and three balls and waited for the sale to occur.

In the AI version of the patter, there is no passing of a furry ball through one or two cups.  Chat GPT goes for a more of a classic version of the trick.  It even gives itself a compliment on its AI powers at the end. Chat GPT describes this patter as  “This patter keeps the routine light-hearted and fun, focusing on misdirection and humor to enhance the audience’s experience.”

Our patter was developed by copying exactly what we were taught by the owner of the magic shop and Chat GPT was not was not available to us way back then.  Heck, this was before personal computers and whatnot.  Actually, we had “whatnot” but not a lot of it and it was mostly our older sibling’s whatnot and we got it as a hand-me-down.

Slide Rule Fun from International Slide Rule History Museum
Fun Pre-Computer

The closest we had to a computer was a slide rule.  It got Neil Armstrong to the moon and back so no shade to it.   In fact, next to Magic, it was our chief passion.  We went on to become the president of our high school’s Slide Rule Club.  Oh the fun we had seeing who could calculate figures to the greatest number of

decimals.  We’re sure you can imagine.

Anyway . . .

Our prompt for this to Chat GPT was: “write patter for a magician performing ‘cups and balls'”

Here’s its routine:

This patter keeps the routine light-hearted and fun, focusing on misdirection and humor to enhance the audience’s experience.

Magician:

“Welcome, everyone! Now, what I have here are three cups and three balls. Three very ordinary cups and very extraordinary balls. I know, you’re probably thinking, ‘Those cups look suspicious!’ But I assure you, they’re just as innocent as my search history. Let’s begin, shall we?”

(Magician displays the cups and balls.)

Magician:
“Now, the cups are solid, the balls are solid, and my logic is questionable, but trust me, this is magic. The goal of this trick is simple: keep your eyes on the balls. The first ball goes under the first cup…”

(Magician places a ball under the first cup.)

Magician:
“…The second ball goes under the second cup…”

(Magician places a ball under the second cup.)

Magician:
“…And the third ball goes under…oh wait, it’s in my pocket! Magic already, right?”

(Pulls ball from pocket, jokingly places it back under the third cup.)

Magician:
“Now watch closely, because the balls are sneaky. They don’t like staying where you put them. Just like your car keys or your remote control. I wave my magic wand, give a little tap, and—”

(Magician lifts the cups to reveal the balls have moved.)

Magician:
“Would you look at that! The balls have decided to play musical chairs! But we’re just getting started.”

(Magician continues moving the balls under different cups while distracting the audience with humorous banter.)

Magician:
“Now I know what you’re thinking: ‘He’s just moving the balls around, right?’ And yes, you’re absolutely right…except when you’re wrong! Watch this—one tap, and…”

(Magician lifts all the cups to reveal a large ball or a surprise object, like a lemon.)

Magician:
“See, you thought there were three little balls, but magic has a way of surprising us all! Now, how did that get under there? Maybe it’s lemon juice for my tea!”

(Magician pauses for audience reaction.)

Magician:
“And just like that, folks, you’ve witnessed the mystery of the Cups and Balls—a trick that’s been baffling minds for centuries. I hope you enjoyed it as much as the cups did. Thank you!”

 

Houdini’s Limit on Google

Inside Magic Image of Harry HoudiniWe love the world’s best known magician, Houdini. We also take great pride in our programming abilities and yet we were stumped yesterday trying to load an active graph from Google documenting the past and present searches for Houdini since 2010. We couldn’t go back further; like to 1920 and figured out that we were limited by the reality that Google did not exist in the Roaring Twenties.

So while we don’t have the live data stream for Houdini searches on InsideMagic.com yet, we can report that the term Houdini continues to be searched daily with peaks in the number of searches on special days and weeks around Halloween and the date of his death in 1926.

Why were we trying to construct this real-time search presentation?

First because we thought it was a cool tool to put on our website. We’re always looking to spice up our space.

Second, because we search for news or articles about Houdini daily. Sometimes the searches come back related to a rapper that used Houdini in his name. Sometimes it comes back with a wine bottle opener. Sometimes it comes back with the great Houdini Magic Shop from Disneyland or Las Vegas. But usually there is at least one hit for Houdini, the world-famous magician and escape artist par excellence.

It is amazing that his name, story and images still register on the Google Search metrics.

What a testament to his self-promotion, his place in modern history and his ability to entrance modern audiences even without being present (assuming you disregard claims of connections during seances).

Magicians today still make reference to Houdini in their acts; often comparing themselves to the master performer. The modern audiences have never seen Houdini (other than the Tony Curtis film, perhaps) but the reference still resonates with them.

We tried to think of other performers that have that kind of staying power. In the 1920s the American and European theaters were jammed full of performers and on a typical evening’s bill, there would be a star or top act. Yet, we are at a loss to name any of them unless they later had a career in a more permanent medium like film or radio.

Houdini is what got us heavily into magic and we assume his popularity is having the same effect on a new generation of magicians and escape artists.

What a wonderful art we have.

By the way, if we are ever in doubt about Houdini’s work or history, we refer to the source that knows all, Wild About Houdini, run by John Cox. If you are a Houdini fan, it needs to be your first stop daily for the latest findings and exploration about this incredible legend.

We will continue to work with our crack programming team to get real time search stats on InsideMagic.com but until then, we’ll just report the highlights we find through our searching or from Mr. Cox’ website.

Inside Magic Letters to the Editor

Picture of Inside Magic EditorIt is the policy of Inside Magic – a company unrelated to Magic Inside (a pseudo-Twinkie manufacturer now defunct) or Magic Outside (a well-established camping equipment rental for witches) or Magic Inside Out (a surgical practice specializing in removing things from people with “exceptional skill and knowledge of modern medicine combined with medical waste management) – to publish responses to emails received on a quarterly basis or earlier if required by a court of appropriate jurisdiction.  If you have a question or letter to the editor, please feel free to write to editor@insidemagic.com.

 

Q:           In one of your stories you said that a man in some country did a really amazing trick with some kind of animal.  Can you tell me what that article was and where I can find it? 

A:            From your detailed question, we were able to find the exact article, “Man Does Amazing Trick with an Animal.”  We have sent you a PDF version of the article but as you likely know, it was removed from the InsideMagic.com website in response to adverse reaction not to performing magic tricks with animals, but, in the words of Professor of English Literature at the London Community College, “intentionally or reckless vagueness of subject and object in a headline.”  Our lawyer said the chances of losing the case was low but because we only had about $4.78 in petty cash at the time – and all of that went to the lawyer – we decided we could not afford the risk.  We removed the article and apologized to readers.  See, “We’re Sorry We Had a Vague Headline on an Article We Published a While Ago.”

 

Q:           Why don’t you have Mandrake the Magician comics anymore?

A:            It’s true we used to run the Mandrake comic each day.  We ran out of money and so we had to end our license with King Features Syndicate — publisher of Mandrake.  We tried to replace the very popular feature – indeed, readers told us it was the only reason they read InsideMagic.com – with JoJo the Magic Clown comics.  While not as well-known as Mandrake, the JoJo series featured a magician who investigated crimes he himself committed.  The series ended after a week due to this unfortunate plot design.  We then went with Ranger Steve comics.  These strips lasted longer than JoJo but had nothing to do with magic.  They were daily exploration of the animal world.  No one read Ranger Steve; not even the editors of the comic.  There were constant errors such as “the rabbit is the only flower that can create seeds without birds.”  We reported the strip to the London Community College English Literature department.

 

Q:           Every ad for a trick says, “It’s the best ever” or “I was fooled constantly by this one” or “This is a trick that wows audiences and slays magicians.”  Which one should I buy?

A:            You’re right that many advertisers make claims that an effect is unique and the best thing to ever come down the pike.  In fact, we received an email today that said just that, “this effect is unique and the best thing to ever come down the pike.”  In our opinion, the best trick is the InsideMagic.com “Incredi-deck.”  It is the only combination of a marked deck where every card is the same.  The possibilities are endless.  You’ll know immediately whether the person took the card you handed them because it will have the name of the card written in ink visible only to those wearing the Incredi-glasses or Incredi-contact lenses (sold separately).  We printed up about 1,000 decks and still have just over 900 left (if you consider “just over” to mean, 987).  We sold out of the Incredi-glasses and Incredi-contact lenses to a spy organization that we think works for either the U.S. or some other country.  The reviews on the deck and vision methods were fantastic – but only from the spy organization and even then only in coded messages visible only whilst wearing the Incredi-glasses or Incredi-contacts.  We would re-print them here but we’re not sure about international spy regulations when it comes to copyright law.

 

Q:           At that party at the convention before Covid-19, you left early and forgot to pay for your ticket.  We’ll wave the penalty fee and interest but insist you pay for the ticket.  If we do not hear back from you with payment, we may be forced to pursue legal action.

A:            We weren’t at that party and we didn’t leave early, it was just running so long with the constant music, free-flowing drinks, wonderful, mini-wieners on toothpicks (by the way, you should warn guests that there is a toothpick in the mini-wieners before they eat a handful), that we would have been well-within our right to leave early; if we had been there but we weren’t.  We should send you the hospital bill for the removal of tooth picks lodged at various points in our digestive system.  We used Magic Inside and Out and they did a great job.  The best version of wood removal from a digestive track to come down the pike.

AI Compares Magicians Houdini & Blaine

Inside Magic Image of Wonderful Poster Promoting Harry Houdini's Incredible Milk Can Escape - Failure Means a Drowning DeathWe previously wrote our impressions of AI’s ability to explain the secrets of magic.  We found that, at least with our prompts, the AI wizard was unable to describe the methods of some of today’s most popular tricks.  So, today, we tried a more historical prompts.  Here is Google AI’s comparison of Harry Houdini and David Blaine.  We agree with the conclusion that both magicians should be considered “Titans” of our art.

AI: David Blaine and Harry Houdini, while both masters of illusion, represent vastly different eras and approaches to magic. Comparing them reveals interesting contrasts:

Harry Houdini (1874-1926):

  • Focus: Escape artistry. His fame rested on his incredible escapes from handcuffs, straitjackets, milk cans, buried alive, and even submerged underwater tanks. He meticulously developed his skills and physical prowess, emphasizing the danger and athleticism of his acts.

  • Presentation: Showmanship was key, but it was grounded in a sense of gritty realism. His performances were often straightforward, emphasizing the challenge and the sheer skill required to overcome seemingly impossible odds. He cultivated an image of a strong, determined individual who conquered adversity. He rarely relied on elaborate stagecraft or misdirection in the same way modern illusionists do.

  • Methodology: Focused on physical skill, strength, and understanding of locks, mechanisms, and the limitations of materials. He frequently challenged and debunked fraudulent mediums and spiritualists, emphasizing the power of scientific understanding and skepticism.

  • Legacy: Houdini remains a legendary figure synonymous with escape artistry. His name is immediately recognizable, and he continues to inspire generations of magicians.

David Blaine (born 1973):

  • Focus: Street magic, endurance feats, and close-up illusions. While he performs escapes, they are often integrated into broader, more conceptual performances. His focus is on creating a sense of wonder and astonishment, often through seemingly impossible feats under seemingly impossible circumstances.

  • Presentation: Highly theatrical and visually stunning, utilizing advanced technology and creative staging. He often incorporates elements of performance art and often chooses unusual, public locations for his acts. He cultivates a mysterious and almost otherworldly persona.

  • Methodology: Employs a blend of sleight of hand, misdirection, and psychological manipulation. While some of his methods are known, others remain shrouded in mystery, adding to his mystique. He is less focused on pure physical skill and more on crafting a captivating narrative and experience.

  • Legacy: Blaine’s influence lies in his ability to reshape the public perception of magic. He brought it into the modern era, utilizing media and spectacle to create viral moments and a cult-like following.

Key Differences Summarized:

Feature Houdini David Blaine
Primary Focus Escape artistry Street magic, endurance, illusion
Presentation Gritty realism, physical skill Theatrical, modern spectacle
Methodology Physical skill, mechanical knowledge Sleight of hand, misdirection, psychological manipulation
Persona Strong, determined adventurer Mysterious, almost otherworldly
Emphasis Overcoming physical challenges Creating wonder and astonishment

In essence, Houdini was a master of physical prowess and mechanical ingenuity, while Blaine is a master of psychological manipulation and modern performance art, both utilizing magic as a vehicle for entertainment and spectacle, but with vastly different approaches and legacies. They both, however, remain titans in the world of magic.

What Goes Into Inventing a New Magic Trick?

Slide Rule Fun from International Slide Rule History Museum
Fun Pre-Computer

What goes into inventing a magic trick?

That’s a question we are trying to answer as we develop, possibly for sale, an effect that could be popular with close-up magicians.  Because that’s what we do, close-up magic, it seemed natural to make commercial offerings of the tricks we do for audiences in the amateur rooms at The Magic Castle.

So we have this trick that audiences seem to enjoy and it really just depends on sleight of hand invented by our forbears.  We don’t know who invented the classic force – perhaps Johann Hofzinser back in the 1800s or someone more recent.  We want to credit the right person and so we search.  We can tell you one thing for sure, do not look up “Classic Force” on Google from your work computer.  Wow.  There is something not right with this world.

The second part of the trick involves a false pass of an object.  Who invented that?  Maybe one of Hofzinser’s friends or students or maybe it was T. Nelson Downs (“The King of Koins”).  We want to credit this move to its rightful owner as well.

But inventing a trick means more than giving credit to the right person.  We found we needed to write instructions for magicians wishing to practice the effect and performing it to maximum effect.  We are not big on giving a link to the magician and letting him or her find the instruction video on-line.  It seems impersonal and an easy way out.  We’re more of a UF Grant kind of organization with illustrated instructions covering each move and describing how to perform said move.

Let’s assume we get past the crediting and the instruction writing, the next step will be to come up with a name that grabs users’ attention.  We never had a name for this trick.  It was always just the effect we working on.  We’ll have to work on that as well.

Finally, we have to write ad copy that doesn’t mislead potential buyers.  We want to be honest about the effect to be presented from the audience’s point of view, the skills necessary to perform the effect, any angle issues, and whether the performer will need to practice to perform.

Let’s assume we get the ad copy correct and have no blatant lies in our listing, we will have to get friends and associates to write one sentence, objective recommendations for the effect.  We know some influential people and maybe they would be kind enough to write such praise.  We’d like some of the praise to follow the current trend of “fooled me badly,” “the kind of trick you will carry always” “I was floored” “Not since biblical times has such a miracle been seen,” “I rank the inventions as Sliced Bread, [the yet to be named trick] and the cotton gin,” “if I could buy only one trick that I would use constantly it would be …” “the finest trick of its kind anywhere” or the ever popular “I wish this wasn’t being sold so I could be the only one who had it.”

Then comes the pricing.  We don’t know how to price an ordinary deck of cards (with which one can perform second deals) and the special gimmicks that make the trick possible.  We’re thinking the cards could be supplied by the performer so we would only need to send the gimmicks.  They don’t weigh too much – maybe a couple of ounces but they are specially made and cost us about $14 each.  So we’re looking at a total cost of $30 or so.  By checking mark-up of similar effects, we figure that means we should charge anywhere from $45 to $75.

Of course the second we launch the effect, we’ll learn from the various forums that the trick was actually invented by someone either a year ago or back in the 1920s.  We’ll feel terrible, apologize and take it off the market.

That’s just how we work.  We believe in not stealing effects, even if it is done without actual knowledge.  We don’t steal jokes either.  In fact, we have a non-stealing philosophy about most things – we’ll steal a kiss from our sweetie or steal fake fruit from a movie set if the script calls for it – but otherwise we’re this side of taking things we don’t own outright.

We wonder how so many magicians can invent new tricks, take the criticism of theft that comes from the magic public; or worse, failure to properly credit the innovators who invented parts of the trick.  They must have iron constitutions.  It would send us into a shame spiral – and not a good kind where you’re ashamed that you won a beauty contest over someone who came in second only because she couldn’t remember a good answer to one of those questions asked by celebrity judges.  A bad kind of shame spiral where you doubt everything you have ever done and assume no one like you.

We thought about copyrighting, patenting or trademarking the trick to prevent theft – assuming we are the inventor of the trick but our research shows that none of these intellectual property laws would help.  Copyright goes to the expression of an idea on paper or in action.  We could copyright our instructions but someone could come along with a new set of instructions and avoid a copyright claim.  A trademark only protects indications of origin of the effect.  As long as the thief differentiated the source with a new trademark or name for the trick – which right now would be easy because it doesn’t have a name – he or she would be scott-free.  A patent would not help because we would have to expose the secret to the patent office and to the world.  There would be nothing to sell, the secret would be out.  There are plenty of examples of patented magic tricks.  We would normally link such things but do not want to give away secrets — even very old ones.

Maybe we’ll keep the trick in our act, teach magicians we know if they ask, and watch as they improve upon it in their performances.  No shame spiral is likely and pride is almost certain to come.

If you see us and want to know the trick (assuming you are a bona fide magician) we’ll share it with you if it isn’t already obvious from our performance.  Sharing is caring and we care deeply about our wonderful art and the friends we have met.  The same friends we would have imposed upon to write glowing reviews such as “I literally lost control of my bodily functions upon seeing the effect,” or “this is the kind of trick with which you can start a cult.”

No Show and It was Great!

We have a new act and look for any opportunity to try it out. We need to get in some flights to see if it holds together and if it is something we should continue performing.

Friday night at The Magic Castle was buzzing. There were so many people — all in their finest garb — mingling on the first floor as the second dinner setting was about to commence.

For those of us who are not in the big rooms upstairs, we have an opportunity to perform in the basement, just below the main lobby.

We too are dressed to the nines and the folks who venture down from upstairs are dressed as if they just came from a Hollywood premier. Maybe some had; not sure.

We were in the big room (downstairs) known as the Cellar. It seats about 20 people but more folks can stand along the railing in the back of the room.

We had a chance to watch the great Matt Vizio (pictured above) perform first. He is amazing and normally we would avoid being so close to such a model against which to be judged but we had that hunger to get up and show our new stuff.

It is a gnawing hunger that feels like you’re going to burst if you can’t get up there. There are no nerves (at least not that we noticed) but there is excitement. We checked our props carefully, checked them again, and then fastened rubber bands around our decks in special symbolic fashion to allow their quick access without looking.

Mr. Vizio was done with his third standing ovation and we walked down to the pit of the theater to perform.

For those who have seen us perform in the past, say, 35 years, the first part was nothing new. The jokes were the same, the moves were the same, the revelation was the same and even the deck was almost the same.

Now it was time to try our new trick. The little baby bird that needs to experience life outside of the nest and, if possible, fly; nay, soar.

Continue reading “No Show and It was Great!”

The Truth About Banshees

Line drawing of a banshee scaring men
Banshee Scaring Folk

Being of solid Irish stock, we were raised to fear the banshee.

We never knew what they would do or what they wanted but our elders reminded us to either do or don’t do some thing to avoid the screams of the banshee outside our windows at night.

We now live in a high rise unit — we’re not bragging but it is impressive to have a two story double-wide trailer home — so the banshees’ wailing would be heard by our downstairs neighbors.  We doubt they would hear the noise but they would act as a good sound buffer for us.

This all comes up due to our tripping over this article on the very topic.

It is not strictly magic, but it is mystical; so it sort of counts.

Check out the full deets on banshee’s here.

Houdini: A Case Study in Trauma

Today's Trauma Care Could Have Saved HoudiniThe May 21, 2009 on-line edition of the journal Advance for LPNs features Cynthia Blank Reid captivating review of the ultimately unsuccessful trauma treatment administered Harry Houdini.

Ms. Reid approaches the Houdini case not as a magic historian or Houdini enthusiast.  Her expertise is in medical miracles.  She works as a trauma clinical nurse specialist in Philadelphia and her perspective is illuminating.

She  gives a clinical evaluation of Houdini’s physical condition prior to his appendicitis.

“Houdini was a relatively small man, standing 5’5″,” she writes.  “He kept himself in shape by swimming, running and doing acrobatics. His medical history was unremarkable until early October 1926, when a series of events would culminate in his death.”

Houdini’s ability and willingness to perform through pain was evidenced when he broke a bone earlier in that fateful year.

“Then, one night in 1926, while performing his famous Water Torture Cell escape, during which Houdini hung suspended upside-down in a chamber of water, ropes secured to his feet were jerked improperly, causing his ankle to break. Houdini refused medical care, insisting the show go on.”

She recounts the slugging received from a McGill University student and his complaints of stomach pain later that evening.

“The next day, Houdini, Bess and his assistants caught a late train and traveled 1,000 miles to begin shows in Detroit. While on the train, he experienced stomach pains so severe Bess telegraphed ahead to request a doctor meet them at the Statler Hotel.
Unfortunately, the train was late and there was no time to go to the hotel, so everyone went directly to the old Garrick Theater to set up for the next show.

“At the theater, Houdini, suffering from a 104º F fever, was diagnosed with acute appendicitis by Daniel Cohn, MD. He recommended emergency surgery.

“Houdini refused and went on with the show, which started 30 minutes late. He collapsed after the first act, but was able to revive himself and continue with the rest of the show.

“After the final act, he collapsed again and was taken to the hotel. This time, Dr. Cohn brought with him Charles S. Kennedy, MD, chief of surgery at Detroit’s Grace Hospital. He agreed Houdini needed an operation. Houdini then called his personal physician, William Stone, who was at home in New York.
Only after the physicians consulted on the phone did Houdini agree to go to Grace Hospital.”

Ms. Reid concludes that while Houdini died from peritonitis stemming from his ruptured appendix, there remain questions about the case.
Seven days before he passed away, surgeons performed an appendectomy.

The doctors “discovered his appendix was ruptured and gangrenous. He also was suffering from a fulminating streptococcal peritonitis. There were no antibiotics. Doctors told Bess his illness was fatal.

While Houdini would rally slightly after a second operation five days later designed to remove some of the infection, it was short-lived.

Ms. Reid suggests Houdini’s case is worth study for even modern professionals.  She points out there are no reported cases of “an appendix being ruptured by blunt trauma. Could Houdini’s be the first?”

If the slugging did not cause the rupture, could it still have had some role in the spread of the infection?

“Is it possible an abscess had formed around his appendix? The abscess would have walled off the infection, but when he was struck in the abdomen, did it rupture?”  she suggests.

“There are documented cases of appendix abscesses, and some of them have ruptured. Was Houdini already suffering from appendicitis when he received the blows to his abdomen? If so, did it cause him to delay seeking medical treatment for any discomfort until it was too late?”

Ms. Reid believes that if Houdini presented the same symptoms in a modern trauma center today, the doctors would still operate on the magician.  The surgery plus today’s antibiotics would have most certainly saved his life.

Check out the on-line version of LPN Advance here.

Houdini Victim of Attack, Dead in Nine Days

Flop SweatThis was the day, 98 years ago, that a Canadian art student struck Houdini as he reclined backstage and began the peritonitis to take charge.  The impact of the punch was sudden but the death it caused lasted another nine days.  On Halloween at 1:26 pm, the great magician gave into his final challenge and passed.

J. Gorden Whitehead administered the fatal blow on an unsuspecting performer.  He hadn’t yet readied his body to demonstrate his ability to survive such a blow.  Whitehead challenged the performer sayin he had heard Houdini’s stomach muscles were strong enough to resist such a blow.  Before he could brace his frame for the impact, Whitehead delivered the fatal strike.

The website, Vantage News, has good coverage and the rumors that flowed about the attack being revenge for Houdini’s outspoken attacks on fraudulent mediums and so-called psychics.

From the Vantage News website this evening:

Whitehead, a student from McGill University, had heard that Houdini could withstand hard punches to the abdomen, a stunt the magician often demonstrated during his performances. During the visit, Whitehead asked if this was true, and without warning, he struck Houdini multiple times in the stomach. Houdini, who was reclining on a couch at the time and not prepared for the attack, didn’t have time to tighten his muscles to absorb the blows.

Despite being in pain, Houdini continued with his scheduled performances over the next few days. However, his condition worsened, and after collapsing during a show in Detroit, he was rushed to the hospital. Doctors discovered that Houdini was suffering from acute appendicitis, and his appendix had ruptured, causing a serious infection known as peritonitis. Houdini underwent surgery on October 24, but his health continued to decline, and he passed away on October 31, 1926, at the age of 52.

Please be sure to check out Vantage News for more information and images of Houdini’s funeral.

A dark day in the life of Houdini fanatics.

But speaking of Houdini Fanatics (Capital “F” for Famous Fanatics), be sure to check out John Cox’ website for all things Houdini at “Wild About Harry” here.  If John didn’t say it, I don’t believe it.  He is the ultimate arbiter of Houdini lore and facts.

Magic this Month – Help Us Help You

Inside Magic Image of Ask Alexander Logo
Alexander Wants to Know

This truly is the magic season.

Magicians see this next couple of weeks as others see Amazon Prime Day.

We would love to promote your upcoming shows without cost if you’ll send us the information.

It does not matter if you move by large trucks and or an overloaded SUV.

Send us you details and we’ll get the word out to our readers.  Attach any promotional images you would like to have us share.

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning

Warning.